Long-term oncologic outcomes for simultaneous resection of synchronous metastatic liver and primary colorectal cancer

Background Twenty-five percent of patients with colorectal cancer present with simultaneous liver metastasis. Complete resection is the only potential curative treatment. Due to improvements in operative and perioperative management, simultaneous liver and colon resections are an accepted procedure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2016-07, Vol.160 (1), p.67-73
Hauptverfasser: Silberhumer, Gerd R., MD, Paty, Philip B., MD, Denton, Brian, MS, MA, Guillem, Jose, MD, Gonen, Mithat, MD, Araujo, Raphael L.C., MD, PhD, Nash, Garret M., MD, Temple, Larissa K., MD, Allen, Peter J., MD, DeMatteo, Ronald P., MD, Weiser, Martin R., MD, Wong, W. Douglas, MD, Jarnagin, William R., MD, D'Angelica, Michael I., MD, Fong, Yuman, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Twenty-five percent of patients with colorectal cancer present with simultaneous liver metastasis. Complete resection is the only potential curative treatment. Due to improvements in operative and perioperative management, simultaneous liver and colon resections are an accepted procedure at specialized centers for selected patients. Nevertheless, little is known about the long-term, oncologic results of simultaneous operative procedures compared with those of staged operations. Methods Patients with colorectal cancer and simultaneous liver metastases presenting for complete resection at a tertiary cancer center were identified. Patients who received the primary colon resection at an outside institution were excluded from analysis. Results Between 1984 and 2008, 429 patients underwent operative treatment for colorectal cancer with simultaneous liver metastasis. Of these, 320 (75%) had simultaneous resection and 109 had staged resection. There was no difference in the distribution of primary tumor locations between the 2 groups. Mean size of the hepatic metastases was significantly greater in the staged group (median 4 cm vs 2.5 cm; P  
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2016.02.029