Conformation analysis of d-glucaric acid in deuterium oxide by NMR based on its JHH and JCH coupling constants

d‐Glucaric acid (GA) is an aldaric acid and consists of an asymmetric acyclic sugar backbone with a carboxyl group positioned at either end of its structure (i.e., the C1 and C6 positions). The purpose of this study was to conduct a conformation analysis of flexible GA as a solution in deuterium oxide by NMR spectroscopy, based on J‐resolved conformation analysis using proton–proton (3JHH) and proton–carbon (2JCH and 3JCH) coupling constants, as well as nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY). The 2JCH and 3JCH coupling constants were measured using the J‐resolved heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) NMR technique. NOESY correlation experiments indicated that H2 and H5 were in close proximity, despite the fact that these protons were separated by too large distance in the fully extended form of the chain structure to provide a NOESY correlation. The validities of the three possible conformers along the three different bonds (i.e., C2C3, C3C4, and C4C5) were evaluated sequentially based on the J‐coupling values and the NOESY correlations. The results of these analyses suggested that there were three dominant conformers of GA, including conformer 1, which was H2H3:gauche, H3H4:anti, and H4H5:gauche; conformer 2, which was H2H3:gauche, H3H4:anti, and H4H5:anti; and conformer 3, which was H2H3:gauche, H3H4: gauche, and H4H5:anti. These results also suggested that all three of these conformers exist in equilibrium with each other. Lastly, the results of the current study suggested that the conformational structures of GA in solution were ‘bent’ rather than being fully extended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Conformation of d‐glucaric acid (GA), in deuterium oxide was analyzed by NMR, based on J‐resolved conformation analysis using proton–proton (3JHH) and proton–carbon (2JCH and 3JCH) coupling constants, as well as nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy. It was suggested that there were three dominant conformers of GA in equilibrium with each other, including conformer (1 (H2H3:gauche, H3H4:anti, and H4H5:gauche), conformer 2 (H2H3:gauche, H3H4:anti, and H4H5:anti), and conformer 3 (H2H3:gauche, H3H4:gauche and H4H5:anti). Conformational structures of GA in solution were ‘bent’ rather than being fully extended.