Ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of nipple retraction

Purpose Nipple retraction is difficult to diagnose radiologically and extremely worrisome for patients. It occurs most commonly due to pathologies such as previous mastitis or an infiltrative malignancy. With this in mind, the goal of this study was to differentiate benign from malignant lesions of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) 2013-10, Vol.40 (4), p.429-435
Hauptverfasser: Yildirim, Duzgun, Sahin, Mutlu, Tutar, Onur, Kayadibi, Huseyin, Kaur, Ahmet, Coskun, Ali Kagan, Gumus, Terman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Nipple retraction is difficult to diagnose radiologically and extremely worrisome for patients. It occurs most commonly due to pathologies such as previous mastitis or an infiltrative malignancy. With this in mind, the goal of this study was to differentiate benign from malignant lesions of nipple retraction, using the differential characteristics of retroareolar area stiffness, observed by means of the new technological modality of ultrasound elastography (USE). Materials and methods Nineteen unilateral nipple retraction cases, including five cases of mammary ductal carcinoma posteriorly infiltrated the areola, two cases of Paget disease, and 12 cases of mastitis, were investigated. Imaging findings [gray-scale ultrasound (US) and USE analyses of the breasts’ nipple–areolar complex], pathological evaluation, and the results of 4 years of follow-up treatment were obtained. The recorded images were evaluated by two different radiologists, and all data were analyzed statistically. Results Statistical analysis showed that there was a strong correlation between the two radiologists’ evaluations. The US images were not diagnostic for either the malignant or benign conditions. The correlation between the diagnosis using US and the final diagnosis was calculated as 0.436 ( p  = 0.006). However, the USE images were more informative since the correlation ratio between the USE results and the final diagnosis was found to be 0.723 ( p  
ISSN:1346-4523
1613-2254
DOI:10.1007/s10396-013-0439-2