Utility of video consultation to improve the outcomes of home enteral nutrition in a population of frail older patients

Aim To determine whether the outcomes of home enteral nutrition for frail older patients can be improved by video consultation between home visiting staff and a hospital physician, specialized in clinical nutrition, during monthly home visits. Methods A randomized prospective study out of patients a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geriatrics & gerontology international 2016-06, Vol.16 (6), p.762-767
Hauptverfasser: Orlandoni, Paolo, Jukic Peladic, Nikolina, Spazzafumo, Liana, Venturini, Claudia, Cola, Claudia, Sparvoli, Debora, Giorgini, Natascia, Basile, Redenta, Fagnani, Donata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To determine whether the outcomes of home enteral nutrition for frail older patients can be improved by video consultation between home visiting staff and a hospital physician, specialized in clinical nutrition, during monthly home visits. Methods A randomized prospective study out of patients aged older than 65 years receiving home enteral nutrition from the Department of Clinical Nutrition of an Italian geriatric hospital in 2013 was carried. A total of 100 patients were randomly assigned to receive video consultation in addition to regular monthly home visits, 88 patients only had regular monthly home visits. Therapy outcomes – incidence rates of complications, outpatient hospital visits and hospitalizations – were compared between two groups. A logistic regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of the video consultation to improve therapy outcomes. Results Incidence rates for metabolic and gastrointestinal complications were significantly lower for patients who received a video consultation, respectively: 0.032/year “video consultation” versus 0.055/year “no video consultation” (P = 0.0001) and 0.006/year “video consultation” versus 0.028/year “no video consultation” (P 
ISSN:1444-1586
1447-0594
DOI:10.1111/ggi.12551