A NEW BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATE FOR OBSCURED ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

ABSTRACT We propose a new method for estimating the mass of a supermassive black hole, applicable to obscured active galactic nuclei (AGNs). This method estimates the black hole mass using the width of the narrow core of the neutral FeK emission line in X-rays and the distance of its emitting region...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2015-04, Vol.802 (2), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Minezaki, Takeo, Matsushita, Kyoko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT We propose a new method for estimating the mass of a supermassive black hole, applicable to obscured active galactic nuclei (AGNs). This method estimates the black hole mass using the width of the narrow core of the neutral FeK emission line in X-rays and the distance of its emitting region from the black hole based on the isotropic luminosity indicator via the luminosity scaling relation. Assuming the virial relation between the locations and the velocity widths of the neutral FeK line core and the broad Hβ emission line, the luminosity scaling relation of the neutral FeK line core emitting region is estimated. We find that the velocity width of the neutral FeK line core falls between that of the broad Balmer emission lines and the corresponding value at the dust reverberation radius for most of the target AGNs. The black hole mass estimated with this method is then compared with other black hole mass estimates, such as the broad emission-line reverberation mass for type 1 AGNs, the mass based on the H2O maser, and the single-epoch mass estimate based on the polarized broad Balmer lines for type 2 AGNs. We find that is consistent with and , and find that correlates well with . These results suggest that is a potential indicator of the black hole mass for obscured AGNs. In contrast, is systematically larger than by about a factor of 5, and the possible origins are discussed.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
1538-4357
DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/98