In situ X-ray diffraction study of athermal and isothermal omega-phase crystal lattice in Ti-Nb-based shape memory alloys
It is currently not still sufficiently clear whether “athermal” and “isothermal” ω-phases formed in Ti-based alloys are two different phases, or are indeed one phase, albeit with different formation mechanisms and kinetics. An X-ray diffraction study of a crystal structure of both athermal and isoth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials letters 2016-04, Vol.168, p.155-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is currently not still sufficiently clear whether “athermal” and “isothermal” ω-phases formed in Ti-based alloys are two different phases, or are indeed one phase, albeit with different formation mechanisms and kinetics. An X-ray diffraction study of a crystal structure of both athermal and isothermal ω-phases formed in a thermomechanically treated Ti–Nb–Zr alloy was conducted to clarify this situation. It was concluded that the ω-phase formed by two different kinetics: athermal, upon subzero cooling, and isothermal upon 300°C-ageing, possesses a unique crystal lattice structure with c/a=0.613±0.003, but differ in the intensity of the microstress relaxation phenomena accompanying their formation, which are more prominent in the latter than in the former.
•Athermal and isothermal omega-phase formation in Ti-Nb-based SMA.•In situ X-ray diffraction study of omega-phase.•Comparison of athermal and isothermal omega-phases' crystal lattice structures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-577X 1873-4979 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.012 |