Differences in vision performance in different scenarios and implications for design

To design accessibly, designers need good, relevant population data on visual abilities. However, currently available data often focuses on clinical vision measures that are not entirely relevant to everyday product use. This paper presents data from a pilot survey of 362 participants in the UK, cov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2016-07, Vol.55, p.149-155
Hauptverfasser: Goodman-Deane, Joy, Waller, Sam, Latham, Keziah, Price, Holly, Tenneti, Raji, Clarkson, P. John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To design accessibly, designers need good, relevant population data on visual abilities. However, currently available data often focuses on clinical vision measures that are not entirely relevant to everyday product use. This paper presents data from a pilot survey of 362 participants in the UK, covering a range of vision measures of particular relevance to product design. The results from the different measures are compared, and recommendations are given for relative text sizes to use in different situations. The results indicate that text needs to be 17–18% larger for comfortable rather than perceived threshold viewing, and a further 20% larger when users are expected to wear their everyday vision setup rather than specific reading aids. •We present data from a survey of visual acuity with 362 participants.•We use a range of vision measures of particular relevance to product design.•We give recommendations for text sizes to use in different situations.•Text needs to be about 18% larger for comfortable rather than perceived threshold viewing.•It needs to be a further 20% larger if users are not going to use reading glasses.
ISSN:0003-6870
1872-9126
DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.001