Multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling‐based optimization for parameter estimation of large, complex geophysical models

Parameter specification is an important source of uncertainty in large, complex geophysical models. These models generally have multiple model outputs that require multiobjective optimization algorithms. Although such algorithms have long been available, they usually require a large number of model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2016-03, Vol.52 (3), p.1984-2008
Hauptverfasser: Gong, Wei, Duan, Qingyun, Li, Jianduo, Wang, Chen, Di, Zhenhua, Ye, Aizhong, Miao, Chiyuan, Dai, Yongjiu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Parameter specification is an important source of uncertainty in large, complex geophysical models. These models generally have multiple model outputs that require multiobjective optimization algorithms. Although such algorithms have long been available, they usually require a large number of model runs and are therefore computationally expensive for large, complex dynamic models. In this paper, a multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling‐based optimization (MO‐ASMO) algorithm is introduced that aims to reduce computational cost while maintaining optimization effectiveness. Geophysical dynamic models usually have a prior parameterization scheme derived from the physical processes involved, and our goal is to improve all of the objectives by parameter calibration. In this study, we developed a method for directing the search processes toward the region that can improve all of the objectives simultaneously. We tested the MO‐ASMO algorithm against NSGA‐II and SUMO with 13 test functions and a land surface model ‐ the Common Land Model (CoLM). The results demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of MO‐ASMO. Key Points: Develop a surrogate‐based multiobjective optimization method Test the method with 13 functions and one land surface model Evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1002/2015WR018230