Determination of azide impurity in sartans using reversed-phase HPLC with UV detection

[Display omitted] •A gradient external standard HPLC method with UV detection for quantitative analysis of azide in sartans (irbesartan, candesartan, valsartan) was developed and validated.•The method is robust and direct: no derivatization, preconcentration is needed.•The linearity range (0.84–101p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2016-06, Vol.125, p.27-32
Hauptverfasser: Gričar, Maja, Andrenšek, Samo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •A gradient external standard HPLC method with UV detection for quantitative analysis of azide in sartans (irbesartan, candesartan, valsartan) was developed and validated.•The method is robust and direct: no derivatization, preconcentration is needed.•The linearity range (0.84–101ppm) and recovery (94.0–103.0%) of azide from samples is in accordance with USP requirements (10ppm of azide in the sample). A simple and robust, gradient HPLC method was developed for determination of azide ppm (μgg−1) levels in different sartans (irbesartan, candesartan, valsartan). The sartan was dissolved in 0.1M NaOH. Then pH was adjusted to 4.5 with 20% H3PO4 followed by dilution with water. Precipitated API was removed by filtration using 0.45μm membrane PVDF (Polyvinylidene Fluoride) membrane filter, and supernatant was analyzed by gradient elution HPLC at room temperature with Hydro RP HPLC 250×4.6mm, 4μm column and UV detection at 205nm. The best sensitivity was achieved by UV detection cell with 60mm optical path length: LOD 0.17μgg−1 and LOQ 0.84μgg−1 for azide. The USP requirement for maximum azide content in irbesartan is 10μgg−1. The analytical method was validated as per International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines with respect to system precision, intraday precision (repeatability), intermediate precision (ruggedness), linearity, quantitation limit, detection limit, accuracy, standard and sample solution stability, robustness and selectivity/specificity. The method was linear in the range from LOQ (0.84μgg−1) to 101μgg−1 of azide. The correlation coefficient was 0.9999 and bias on y-axis for 84μgg−1 test concentration was 0.33%. The accuracy of the method was established based on the recovery obtained between 94.0% and 103.0% for azide. Standard and sample solutions were stable for at least 48h at room temperature and in refrigerator. The method was found to be robust for variation in column temperature (±5°C) and mobile phase flow rate (±0.2mLmin−1) and selective for anions such as bromide, nitrate, nitrite, formate and acetate.
ISSN:0731-7085
1873-264X
DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2016.03.020