Classification and correction of the bright band using an operational C-band polarimetric radar

•Hydrometeor classification shows improvement in bright band identification.•LDR and correlation coefficient perform the best for melting snow classification.•Idealised profiles perform the best for reducing bright band associated errors. The Bright Band (BB) is a region of enhanced reflectivity in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2015-12, Vol.531, p.248-258
Hauptverfasser: Hall, Will, Rico-Ramirez, Miguel Angel, Krämer, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Hydrometeor classification shows improvement in bright band identification.•LDR and correlation coefficient perform the best for melting snow classification.•Idealised profiles perform the best for reducing bright band associated errors. The Bright Band (BB) is a region of enhanced reflectivity in weather radar scans associated with frozen hydrometeors forming a liquid coating as they fall through the melting layer. This enhancement can cause the radar to overestimate precipitation quantities at the surface. The main objective of this study is to develop a hydrometeor classification algorithm that can use dual-polarisation measurements as the only input to classify the BB area. An effort has been made to replicate the current UK Met Office operational method for BB classification. This involves the use of Numerical Weather Prediction outputs of freezing level heights with an assumption of a constant BB thickness. Vertical Profiles of Reflectivity (VPR) can then be used to correct for the reflectivity enhancement. A mean apparent VPR computed from reflectivity measurements at multiple elevation angles is compared to two idealised VPR methods. For validation the corrected 1.5° elevation scans are compared to surface rain gauge observations and lower elevation scans over the course of 7 events. The hydrometeor classification methods showed the greatest error reductions, with the freezing level forecast method performing well when the BB thickness was within 700m, but poorly when there was more variation. Overall the idealised VPRs allowed for the greatest BB corrections in comparison to the mean profile.
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.011