Ultraviolet emission lines of Si ii in cool star and solar spectra

Recent atomic physics calculations for Si II are employed within the CLOUDY modelling code to analyse Hubble Space Telescope (HST) STIS ultraviolet spectra of three cool stars, beta Geminorum, a Centauri A and B, as well as previously published HST/GHRS observations of a Tau, plus solar quiet Sun da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2016-01, Vol.455 (3), p.3405-3405
Hauptverfasser: Laha, Sibasish, Keenan, Francis P, Ferland, Gary J, Ramsbottom, Catherine A, Aggarwal, Kanti M, Ayres, Thomas R, Chatzikos, Marios, van Hoof, Peter AM, Williams, Robin J R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent atomic physics calculations for Si II are employed within the CLOUDY modelling code to analyse Hubble Space Telescope (HST) STIS ultraviolet spectra of three cool stars, beta Geminorum, a Centauri A and B, as well as previously published HST/GHRS observations of a Tau, plus solar quiet Sun data from the High Resolution Telescope and Spectrograph. Discrepancies found previously between theory and observation for line intensity ratios involving the ... intercombination multiplet of Si II at ~ 2335 A are significantly reduced, as are those for ratios containing the ... transitions at ~1816 A. This is primarily due to the effect of the new Si II transition probabilities. However, these atomic data are not only very different from previous calculations, but also show large disagreements with measurements, specifically those of Calamai et al. for the intercombination lines. New measurements of transition probabilities for Si II are hence urgently required to confirm (or otherwise) the accuracy of the recently calculated values. If the new calculations are confirmed, then a long-standing discrepancy between theory and observation will have finally been resolved. However, if the older measurements are found to be correct, then the agreement between theory and observation is simply a coincidence and the existing discrepancies remain. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
ISSN:0035-8711
1365-2966
DOI:10.1093/mnras/stv2566