Radiographic Assessment of Femoral Stem Torsion in Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Comparison of a Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal Angle-Based Technique With the Budin View

Abstract Background Correct assessment of femoral stem torsion is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to compare a recently published novel method based on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs using the projected caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle (AP CCD) with the modi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2016-05, Vol.31 (5), p.1117-1122
Hauptverfasser: Woerner, Michael L., MD, Weber, Markus, MD, Craiovan, Benjamin S., MD, Springorum, H. Robert, MD, Grifka, Joachim, MD, Renkawitz, Tobias F., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Correct assessment of femoral stem torsion is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to compare a recently published novel method based on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs using the projected caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle (AP CCD) with the modified posteroanterior Budin view. Method AP radiographs, modified Budin views, and 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were obtained in 30 patients after minimally invasive, cementless THA. Radiographic measurements performed by 4 observers twice in a 6-week interval were compared with 3D-CT measurements. Furthermore, correlations between the radiographic deviation to 3D-CT and patient specific characteristics were evaluated. Results We found a mean difference of 2.2 ± 6.8° between AP CCD and 3D-CT measurements of femoral stem torsion and −0.5 ± 4.2° between the modified Budin view and 3D-CT. We found a high correlation between mean radiographic and 3D-CT stem torsion ( r  = 0.78, P < .001 for AP CCD and r  = 0.84, P < .001 for Budin view). The observers had excellent agreements within (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.88 for AP CCD and intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.94 for Budin view) and between (mean concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.79 for AP CCD and concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.86 for Budin view) their radiographic measurements. Conclusion Both radiographic methods enable a simple orientation and a practical conventional radiographic estimation of stem torsion on hip radiographs after THA. However, CT remains the golden standard for exact estimation of stem torsion.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.013