Caspofungin versus Liposomal Amphotericin B for Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Patients with Persistent Fever and Neutropenia

This multinational, double-blind trial compared caspofungin, an echinocandin, with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy in 1095 patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. Caspofungin was as efficacious as the standard therapy and was better tolerated, with less nephrotoxicit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2004-09, Vol.351 (14), p.1391-1402
Hauptverfasser: Walsh, Thomas J, Teppler, Hedy, Donowitz, Gerald R, Maertens, Johan A, Baden, Lindsey R, Dmoszynska, Anna, Cornely, Oliver A, Bourque, Michael R, Lupinacci, Robert J, Sable, Carole A, dePauw, Ben E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This multinational, double-blind trial compared caspofungin, an echinocandin, with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy in 1095 patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. Caspofungin was as efficacious as the standard therapy and was better tolerated, with less nephrotoxicity and fewer drug-related adverse events. This multinational trial compared caspofungin with liposomal amphotericin B. The results support an effective new option for empirical antifungal therapy in high-risk patients. Invasive fungal infections are important causes of illness and death in patients with neutropenia who receive chemotherapy for cancer or who undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. 1 – 3 Persistent fever in patients with neutropenia who are receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics may be the only clinical indication of an invasive fungal infection. Amphotericin B and its lipid formulations, as well as triazoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole), have been studied as empirical antifungal agents in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. 4 – 11 However, these agents may be associated with toxicity and adverse drug interactions and have a limited spectrum of activity, erratic bioavailability, unpredictable pharmacokinetics, . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa040446