Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Co...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2016-04, Vol.38 (S1), p.E2335-E2342 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | E2342 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | E2335 |
| container_title | Head & neck |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Zhang, Wen-Bo Peng, Xin |
| description | Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal databases. Total cervical metastases and occult metastases rate was 32% and 21%, respectively. Positive lymph node detection was likeliest from levels I to III. The maxillary gingival metastases rate was higher than that of the hard palate. Advanced‐stage tumors had higher metastatic risk than early‐stage tumors. Well‐differentiated tumors had a significantly higher metastases rate than medium and poor‐differentiation tumors. N0 cases had survival benefit compared with N+ cases. Metastases rate of oral maxillary SCC correlates significantly with T classification and pathological stage. T and N classifications impact outcome significantly. Therefore, levels I to III selective neck dissection is recommended for patients with T3/4 cN0 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2335–E2342, 2016 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hed.24274 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784745286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1784745286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-704b44fe50efc74c8f7eed7833c3fc13d6a71083809ce015898e9e6b9e5ba5a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0E4r3gB5CXsEiZxE7ssIPylBAgxGtnTZ2JMCQN2C20f49LKTukkTwanbkaH8Z2UuilANnBC1W9TGZKLrH1FEqVgJBqedZLkQhQco1thPAKAKKQ2SpbywpdQgFqnVV98p_OYsNbGmGIRYF3Ne_8bIQT1zTopzx8jLHtxoFbahpu0Vs37Fo85Ec8TMOIWhw5yz19OvriOKx-0hIcYjMNLmyxlRqbQNu_7yZ7ODu9718kVzfnl_2jq8TKspSJAjmQsqYcqLZKWl0rokppIayobSqqAlUKWmgoLUGa61JTScWgpHyAOYLYZHvz3HfffYwpjEzrwuxiHFI83qRKSyXzTBcR3Z-j1ncheKrNu3dt_KpJwcykmijV_EiN7O5v7HjQxumCXFiMwMEc-HINTf9PMhenJ4vIZL7horzJ3wb6N1MooXLzdH1uQD_f3p0dP5o78Q1k2ZEG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784745286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Zhang, Wen-Bo ; Peng, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen-Bo ; Peng, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal databases. Total cervical metastases and occult metastases rate was 32% and 21%, respectively. Positive lymph node detection was likeliest from levels I to III. The maxillary gingival metastases rate was higher than that of the hard palate. Advanced‐stage tumors had higher metastatic risk than early‐stage tumors. Well‐differentiated tumors had a significantly higher metastases rate than medium and poor‐differentiation tumors. N0 cases had survival benefit compared with N+ cases. Metastases rate of oral maxillary SCC correlates significantly with T classification and pathological stage. T and N classifications impact outcome significantly. Therefore, levels I to III selective neck dissection is recommended for patients with T3/4 cN0 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2335–E2342, 2016</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hed.24274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26890607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; cervical metastases ; China ; elective neck dissection ; Female ; hard palate ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis ; maxillary gingiva ; Maxillary Neoplasms - secondary ; Mouth Neoplasms - pathology ; Neck Dissection ; Neoplasm Staging ; Palate, Hard - pathology ; squamous cell carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Head & neck, 2016-04, Vol.38 (S1), p.E2335-E2342</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-704b44fe50efc74c8f7eed7833c3fc13d6a71083809ce015898e9e6b9e5ba5a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-704b44fe50efc74c8f7eed7833c3fc13d6a71083809ce015898e9e6b9e5ba5a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhed.24274$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhed.24274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26890607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Head & neck</title><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><description>Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal databases. Total cervical metastases and occult metastases rate was 32% and 21%, respectively. Positive lymph node detection was likeliest from levels I to III. The maxillary gingival metastases rate was higher than that of the hard palate. Advanced‐stage tumors had higher metastatic risk than early‐stage tumors. Well‐differentiated tumors had a significantly higher metastases rate than medium and poor‐differentiation tumors. N0 cases had survival benefit compared with N+ cases. Metastases rate of oral maxillary SCC correlates significantly with T classification and pathological stage. T and N classifications impact outcome significantly. Therefore, levels I to III selective neck dissection is recommended for patients with T3/4 cN0 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2335–E2342, 2016</description><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>cervical metastases</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>elective neck dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hard palate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>maxillary gingiva</subject><subject>Maxillary Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neck Dissection</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Palate, Hard - pathology</subject><subject>squamous cell carcinoma</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0E4r3gB5CXsEiZxE7ssIPylBAgxGtnTZ2JMCQN2C20f49LKTukkTwanbkaH8Z2UuilANnBC1W9TGZKLrH1FEqVgJBqedZLkQhQco1thPAKAKKQ2SpbywpdQgFqnVV98p_OYsNbGmGIRYF3Ne_8bIQT1zTopzx8jLHtxoFbahpu0Vs37Fo85Ec8TMOIWhw5yz19OvriOKx-0hIcYjMNLmyxlRqbQNu_7yZ7ODu9718kVzfnl_2jq8TKspSJAjmQsqYcqLZKWl0rokppIayobSqqAlUKWmgoLUGa61JTScWgpHyAOYLYZHvz3HfffYwpjEzrwuxiHFI83qRKSyXzTBcR3Z-j1ncheKrNu3dt_KpJwcykmijV_EiN7O5v7HjQxumCXFiMwMEc-HINTf9PMhenJ4vIZL7horzJ3wb6N1MooXLzdH1uQD_f3p0dP5o78Q1k2ZEG</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Zhang, Wen-Bo</creator><creator>Peng, Xin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Zhang, Wen-Bo ; Peng, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-704b44fe50efc74c8f7eed7833c3fc13d6a71083809ce015898e9e6b9e5ba5a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>cervical metastases</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>elective neck dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hard palate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>maxillary gingiva</topic><topic>Maxillary Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neck Dissection</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Palate, Hard - pathology</topic><topic>squamous cell carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Wen-Bo</au><au>Peng, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>E2335</spage><epage>E2342</epage><pages>E2335-E2342</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal databases. Total cervical metastases and occult metastases rate was 32% and 21%, respectively. Positive lymph node detection was likeliest from levels I to III. The maxillary gingival metastases rate was higher than that of the hard palate. Advanced‐stage tumors had higher metastatic risk than early‐stage tumors. Well‐differentiated tumors had a significantly higher metastases rate than medium and poor‐differentiation tumors. N0 cases had survival benefit compared with N+ cases. Metastases rate of oral maxillary SCC correlates significantly with T classification and pathological stage. T and N classifications impact outcome significantly. Therefore, levels I to III selective neck dissection is recommended for patients with T3/4 cN0 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2335–E2342, 2016</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26890607</pmid><doi>10.1002/hed.24274</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1043-3074 |
| ispartof | Head & neck, 2016-04, Vol.38 (S1), p.E2335-E2342 |
| issn | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784745286 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery cervical metastases China elective neck dissection Female hard palate Humans Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis maxillary gingiva Maxillary Neoplasms - secondary Mouth Neoplasms - pathology Neck Dissection Neoplasm Staging Palate, Hard - pathology squamous cell carcinoma |
| title | Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20metastases%20of%20oral%20maxillary%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=Zhang,%20Wen-Bo&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=E2335&rft.epage=E2342&rft.pages=E2335-E2342&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hed.24274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784745286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784745286&rft_id=info:pmid/26890607&rfr_iscdi=true |