Cervical metastases of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Head & neck 2016-04, Vol.38 (S1), p.E2335-E2342
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Wen-Bo, Peng, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cervical treatment of oral maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. We determined the metastases incidence and evaluated its predictive factors. Systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of 23 Chinese and English‐language articles retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal databases. Total cervical metastases and occult metastases rate was 32% and 21%, respectively. Positive lymph node detection was likeliest from levels I to III. The maxillary gingival metastases rate was higher than that of the hard palate. Advanced‐stage tumors had higher metastatic risk than early‐stage tumors. Well‐differentiated tumors had a significantly higher metastases rate than medium and poor‐differentiation tumors. N0 cases had survival benefit compared with N+ cases. Metastases rate of oral maxillary SCC correlates significantly with T classification and pathological stage. T and N classifications impact outcome significantly. Therefore, levels I to III selective neck dissection is recommended for patients with T3/4 cN0 disease. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2335–E2342, 2016
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.24274