Image-enhanced endoscopy for detection of second primary neoplasm in patients with esophageal and head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Image‐enhanced endoscopy is helpful for screening of a second primary neoplasm in patients with esophageal and head and neck cancer. The purpose of this meta‐analysis was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of white‐light imaging (WLI), narrow band imaging (NBI), and Lugol chromoendoscopy for secon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2016-04, Vol.38 (S1), p.E2343-E2349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Image‐enhanced endoscopy is helpful for screening of a second primary neoplasm in patients with esophageal and head and neck cancer. The purpose of this meta‐analysis was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of white‐light imaging (WLI), narrow band imaging (NBI), and Lugol chromoendoscopy for second primary neoplasm detection. A review of the PubMed/Cochrane databases up to May 2014 was performed. Meta‐analysis was done by Meta‐DiSc software and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool. A total of 4918 patients from 16 prospective and randomized trials were enrolled. For WLI, NBI, and Lugol chromoendoscopy, the pooled sensitivities were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48% to 59%), 87% (95% CI = 83% to 90%), and 88% (95% CI = 85% to 91%), respectively; the pooled specificities were 99% (95% CI = 98% to 99%), 95% (95% CI = 94% to 96%), and 63% (95% CI = 61% to 66%), respectively; and the areas under the receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 66%, 97%, and 82%, respectively. NBI endoscopy has the most highly accurate diagnostic performance for detection of second primary neoplasms in high‐risk patients. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2343–E2349, 2016 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.24277 |