Efficacy analysis of sequential treatment with chemotherapy, ATRA and As(2)O(3) for acute promyelocytic leukemia

To investigate the efficacy and treatment outcome of different induction regimens, and different post-remission therapies for adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The outcome of 73 patients with newly diagnosed APL were retrospectively analyzed. According to the induction regimens, the patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zhōnghuá xuèyèxué zázhì 2010-05, Vol.31 (5), p.328-332
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Xiang-Juan, Ren, Han-Yun, Cen, Xi-Nan, Qiu, Zhi-Xiang, Wang, Wen-Sheng, Ou, Jin-Ping, Wang, Ying, Xu, Wei-Lin, Li, Yuan, Wang, Mang-Ju, Wang, Li-Hong, Dong, Yu-Jun, Yin, Yue, Liang, Ze-Yin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the efficacy and treatment outcome of different induction regimens, and different post-remission therapies for adult acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The outcome of 73 patients with newly diagnosed APL were retrospectively analyzed. According to the induction regimens, the patients were divided into three groups: chemotherapy-only (14 cases group I), all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) or combined with chemotherapy (33 cases group II), and ATRA combined with arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) (26 cases group III). The complete remission (CR) rate and the time to CR (TTC) were analyzed. After CR, the patients were divided into 2 groups for post-remission therapies: one with sequential treatment of chemotherapy/ATRA/As(2)O(3) and the other with alternative treatment of chemotherapy/ATRA. The overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and relapse rate were compared between these two groups. Patients induced CR with both ATRA and As(2)O(3), and then sequentially treated with chemotherapy/ATRA/As(2)
ISSN:0253-2727