Family planning, antenatal and delivery care: cross‐sectional survey evidence on levels of coverage and inequalities by public and private sector in 57 low‐ and middle‐income countries

Objective The objective of this study was to assess the role of the private sector in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). We used Demographic and Health Surveys for 57 countries (2000–2013) to evaluate the private sector's share in providing three reproductive and maternal/newborn health...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical medicine & international health 2016-04, Vol.21 (4), p.486-503
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, Oona M. R., Benova, Lenka, MacLeod, David, Baggaley, Rebecca F., Rodrigues, Laura C., Hanson, Kara, Powell‐Jackson, Timothy, Penn‐Kekana, Loveday, Polonsky, Reen, Footman, Katharine, Vahanian, Alice, Pereira, Shreya K., Santos, Andreia Costa, Filippi, Veronique G. A., Lynch, Caroline A., Goodman, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of this study was to assess the role of the private sector in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). We used Demographic and Health Surveys for 57 countries (2000–2013) to evaluate the private sector's share in providing three reproductive and maternal/newborn health services (family planning, antenatal and delivery care), in total and by socio‐economic position. Methods We used data from 865 547 women aged 15–49, representing a total of 3 billion people. We defined ‘met and unmet need for services’ and ‘use of appropriate service types’ clearly and developed explicit classifications of source and sector of provision. Results Across the four regions (sub‐Saharan Africa, Middle East/Europe, Asia and Latin America), unmet need ranged from 28% to 61% for family planning, 8% to 22% for ANC and 21% to 51% for delivery care. The private‐sector share among users of family planning services was 37–39% across regions (overall mean: 37%; median across countries: 41%). The private‐sector market share among users of ANC was 13–61% across regions (overall mean: 44%; median across countries: 15%). The private‐sector share among appropriate deliveries was 9–56% across regions (overall mean: 40%; median across countries: 14%). For all three healthcare services, women in the richest wealth quintile used private services more than the poorest. Wealth gaps in met need for services were smallest for family planning and largest for delivery care. Conclusions The private sector serves substantial numbers of women in LMICs, particularly the richest. To achieve universal health coverage, including adequate quality care, it is imperative to understand this sector, starting with improved data collection on healthcare provision. Objectif Evaluer le rôle du secteur privé dans les pays à faible revenu et à revenu intermédiaire (PFR‐PRI). Nous avons utilisé des enquêtes démographiques et de santé dans 57 pays (2000‐2013) pour évaluer sa part dans la fourniture de trois services de santé reproductive et maternelle/néonatale (planification familiale, soins prénatals et de l'accouchement) au total et par situation socioéconomique. Méthodes Nous avons utilisé les données de 865.547 femmes de 15 à 49 ans, représentant une population totale de 3 milliards de personnes. Nous avons défini clairement « les besoins satisfaits et non satisfaits en matière de services» et «l'utilisation des types de services appropriés” et avons développé des classifications explicites d
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/tmi.12681