Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis
Background and Purpose Early relapse outcomes in long‐term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of neurology 2016-04, Vol.23 (4), p.729-736 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Purpose
Early relapse outcomes in long‐term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown.
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFNβ/GA, relative to a propensity‐matched comparator of patients remaining on IFNβ/GA.
Methods
The MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6‐month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables (‘switchers’) to oral agents were compared with propensity‐matched patients remaining on IFNβ/GA (‘stayers’) using a Cox marginal model.
Results
Three‐hundred and ninety‐six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1−6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6‐month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26).
Conclusion
This is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1351-5101 1468-1331 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ene.12929 |