Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis

Background and Purpose Early relapse outcomes in long‐term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of neurology 2016-04, Vol.23 (4), p.729-736
Hauptverfasser: Spelman, T., Mekhael, L., Burke, T., Butzkueven, H., Hodgkinson, S., Havrdova, E., Horakova, D., Duquette, P., Izquierdo, G., Grand'Maison, F., Grammond, P., Barnett, M., Lechner-Scott, J., Alroughani, R., Trojano, M., Lugaresi, A., Granella, F., Pucci, E., Vucic, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Purpose Early relapse outcomes in long‐term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFNβ/GA, relative to a propensity‐matched comparator of patients remaining on IFNβ/GA. Methods The MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6‐month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables (‘switchers’) to oral agents were compared with propensity‐matched patients remaining on IFNβ/GA (‘stayers’) using a Cox marginal model. Results Three‐hundred and ninety‐six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1−6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6‐month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26). Conclusion This is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy.
ISSN:1351-5101
1468-1331
DOI:10.1111/ene.12929