Criteria‐based audit of caesarean section in a referral hospital in rural Tanzania

Objective WHO uses the Caesarean section (CS) rate to monitor implementation of emergency obstetric care (EmOC). Although CS rates are rising in sub‐Saharan Africa, maternal outcome has not improved. We audited indications for CS and related complications among women with severe maternal morbidity a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical medicine & international health 2016-04, Vol.21 (4), p.525-534
Hauptverfasser: Heemelaar, S., Nelissen, E., Mdoe, P., Kidanto, H., Roosmalen, J., Stekelenburg, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective WHO uses the Caesarean section (CS) rate to monitor implementation of emergency obstetric care (EmOC). Although CS rates are rising in sub‐Saharan Africa, maternal outcome has not improved. We audited indications for CS and related complications among women with severe maternal morbidity and mortality in a referral hospital in rural Tanzania. Methods Cross‐sectional study was from November 2009 to November 2011. Women with severe maternal morbidity and mortality were identified and those with CS were included in this audit. Audit criteria were developed based on the literature review and (inter)national guidelines. Tanzanian and Dutch doctors reviewed hospital notes. The main outcome measured was prevalence of substandard quality of care leading to unnecessary CS and delay in performing interventions to prevent CS. Results A total of 216 maternal near misses and 32 pregnancy‐related deaths were identified, of which 82 (33.1%) had a CS. Indication for CS was in accordance with audit criteria for 36 of 82 (44.0%) cases without delay. In 20 of 82 (24.4%) cases, the indication was correct; however, there was significant delay in providing standard obstetric care. In 16 of 82 (19.5%) cases, the indication for CS was not in accordance with audit criteria. During office hours, CS was more often correctly indicated than outside office hours (60.0% vs. 36.0%, P < 0.05). Discussion Caesarean section rate is not an useful indicator to monitor quality of EmOC as a high rate of unnecessary and potentially preventable CS was identified in this audit. Objectif l’OMS utilise le taux des césariennes pour surveiller l'implémentation des soins obstétricaux d'urgence. Bien que les taux de césariennes soient en hausse en Afrique subsaharienne, les résultats maternels ne se sont pas améliorés. Nous avons audité les indications pour la césarienne et les complications connexes chez les femmes avec une morbidité maternelle sévère et une mortalité dans un hôpital de référence en zone rurale, en Tanzanie. Méthodes Etude transversale de novembre 2009 à novembre 2011. Les femmes avec une morbidité maternelle sévère et une mortalité ont été identifiées et celles avec une césarienne ont été incluses dans cet audit. Les critères d'audit ont été élaborés sur base de revues de la littérature et de directives (inter)nationales. Des médecins tanzaniens et néerlandais ont analysé les registres de l'hôpital. Le résultat principal mesuré était la prévalence des soins de qualité inféri
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/tmi.12683