Effect of subconjunctival glucose on retinal ganglion cell survival in experimental retinal ischaemia and contrast sensitivity in human glaucoma

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival glucose on the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in experimental retinal ischaemia and contrast sensitivity in humans with primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods First, we measured the intravitreal concentration of glucose at various...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2016-01, Vol.44 (1), p.24-32
Hauptverfasser: Shibeeb, O'Sam, Chidlow, Glyn, Han, Guoge, Wood, John PM, Casson, Robert J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aims to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival glucose on the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in experimental retinal ischaemia and contrast sensitivity in humans with primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods First, we measured the intravitreal concentration of glucose at various time points after a subconjunctival injection of 100 μl of 50% glucose to Sprague‐Dawley rats. Next, treatment and control groups received 50% subconjunctival glucose and iso‐osmotic (8%) saline, respectively, 1 h prior to a unilateral ischaemic retinal injury; 7 days later, the damage profiles were compared using RGC and axon counts. Subsequently, we conducted a double‐blind, crossover, pilot clinical study in seven eyes of five pseudophakic subjects with severe POAG. Subjects received either 0.3 mL of 50% glucose subconjunctivally or iso‐osmotic (8%) saline, then vice versa after a 2–3 week ‘wash‐out’ period; change in contrast sensitivity from baseline was the primary outcome. Results Subconjunctival glucose preserved approximately 60% of Brn3a‐positive RGCs in all retinal zones compared with an 80% loss in control retinas, and rescued approximately 40% of the axonal loss. In the human trial, the contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles/degree was 0.24 log units greater than baseline (95% confidence interval 0.12–0.36; P 
ISSN:1442-6404
1442-9071
DOI:10.1111/ceo.12581