Coopetition close to the customer — A case study of a small business network
Coopetition interactions are traditionally divided into competing activities close to the customer, called output activities (e.g., sales and marketing), and cooperating activities far from the customer, known as input activities (e.g., logistics, production and R&D). In many coopetition network...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial marketing management 2016-02, Vol.53, p.207-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Coopetition interactions are traditionally divided into competing activities close to the customer, called output activities (e.g., sales and marketing), and cooperating activities far from the customer, known as input activities (e.g., logistics, production and R&D). In many coopetition networks, most of the cooperation has been in input activities, essentially meaning that little research is conducted in coopetition business networks with cooperative activities close to the customer. This article closes the gap by investigating coopetition in an ICT business network comprising small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the B2B sector. The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of cooperation between competing firms by analyzing the success factors of cooperative activities close to the customer that lead to a positive outcome of coopetition. The results of the study show that some case companies are more competition oriented, whereas the others are more cooperation oriented. At the activity level of analysis, cooperation occurs in branding, marketing, joint customers, and delivery of services; whereas companies compete in local services, marketing campaigns, and pricing. In addition, our study shows that certain success factors for coopetition are highlighted, particularly in output activities such as activeness, geographical distance and personal resources.
•Coopetition is evident in interaction close to the customer such as marketing and sales•Coopetitive network companies were mapped into the continuum from weak to strong cooperation and competition interactions•Their activities were categorized along output and input activities and cooperation, competition or balanced interactions•The coopetition continuum does not influence the success of coopetitive relationships, whereas geographic distance does•Factors for successful output activities are strategic fit, activeness, personnel resources, commitment, and participation |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0019-8501 1873-2062 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.06.005 |