Effect of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy on Electrical Remodelling

Background Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an accepted device therapy in patients with low ejection fraction. Beneficial effects of CRT result from mechanical remodelling. Some controversial reports suggest that CRT may also induce electrical remodelling with intrinsic QRS narrowing but s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2016-05, Vol.25 (5), p.471-475
Hauptverfasser: Aslani, Amir, MD, Khajei, Mehrdad, MD, Shahrzad, Shahab, MD, Nikoo, Mohammad Hossein, MD, Jorat, Mohammad Vahid, MD, Bigi, Mohammad Ali Babaee, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an accepted device therapy in patients with low ejection fraction. Beneficial effects of CRT result from mechanical remodelling. Some controversial reports suggest that CRT may also induce electrical remodelling with intrinsic QRS narrowing but still the effect of CRT on electrical remodelling is an issue for debate. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of CRT on intrinsic QRS duration. For clarity, our analysis was performed by the signal averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) which is a high resolution electrocardiographic signal suitable for accurate measurement of QRS duration. Signal averaged electrocardiogram provides a better value of QRS duration compared to 12-lead ECG by the ability to detect ventricular late potentials. Methods A total of 48 consecutive patients with severe systolic dysfunction and typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) were enrolled in the study prospectively. Patients were scheduled for CRT-D implantation according to the current guidelines. Intrinsic QRS duration was accurately measured by SAECG before and at least 14 months after CRT implantation. Results The mean intrinsic QRS duration remained unchanged during follow-up (from 149.9 ± 13.8 ms to 149.6 ± 18.4 ms; P= 0.3). Among 32 CRT responder patients, the mean intrinsic QRS duration remained unchanged during follow-up. Also, the mean intrinsic QRS duration showed no significant changes in 16 CRT non-responders. Conclusion Structural remodelling induced by CRT does not necessarily translate into decrease of intrinsic ventricular activation. Despite significant left ventricular recovery, electrical characteristics of the left ventricular conduction system cannot generally be expected to recuperate.
ISSN:1443-9506
1444-2892
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2015.10.014