Delay in Diagnosis of Basilar Artery Stroke
Background Basilar artery stroke causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Although its unusual clinical presentation potentially contributes to a delay in diagnosis, this problem has not been systematically studied. We compared intervals between symptom onset, initial presentation, and diagnosis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurocritical care 2016-04, Vol.24 (2), p.172-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Basilar artery stroke causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Although its unusual clinical presentation potentially contributes to a delay in diagnosis, this problem has not been systematically studied. We compared intervals between symptom onset, initial presentation, and diagnosis in stroke due to basilar artery (BA) versus left middle cerebral artery (LMCA) occlusion to determine the presence of and potential reasons for diagnostic delay in BA stroke.
Methods
We retrospectively identified 21 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with BA stroke between 2009 and 2011 from our hospital’s prospective stroke registry. Patients were age-, sex-, and race-matched with 21 LMCA stroke patients from the same period. All subjects had confirmed clinical and radiographic diagnosis of stroke due to occlusion or stenosis of the BA, LMCA, or left internal carotid artery. Time to diagnosis was determined independently by two investigators through medical record review. The pre-specified primary outcome was latency from emergency department (ED) arrival to stroke diagnosis.
Results
Median time from ED arrival to diagnosis was 8 h 24 min (IQR: 2:43–26:32) for BA and 1 h 23 min (IQR: 0:41–1:45;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1541-6933 1556-0961 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12028-015-0211-0 |