Prognostic value of PET-CT after first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma: a pooled analysis of central scan review in three multicentre studies

Summary Background The value of18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT (PET) imaging in response assessment after first-line rituximab chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma has been documented. We analysed the application of the five-point Deauville scale (5PS; used to score FDG uptake on PET images) in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet. Haematology 2014-10, Vol.1 (1), p.e17-e27
Hauptverfasser: Trotman, Judith, Dr, Luminari, Stefano, MD, Boussetta, Sami, MS, Versari, Annibale, MD, Dupuis, Jehan, MD, Tychyj, Christelle, MD, Marcheselli, Luigi, MS, Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina, MD, Franceschetto, Antonella, MD, Julian, Anne, MD, Ricard, Fabien, MD, Guerra, Luca, MD, Haioun, Corinne, Prof, Biasoli, Irene, MD, Tilly, Hervé, Prof, Federico, Massimo, Prof, Salles, Gilles, Prof, Meignan, Michel, Prof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background The value of18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT (PET) imaging in response assessment after first-line rituximab chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma has been documented. We analysed the application of the five-point Deauville scale (5PS; used to score FDG uptake on PET images) in a large cohort derived from three studies, to assess the correlation between post-induction PET status and survival in patients with follicular lymphoma. Methods In this pooled analysis, we used data from three multicentre prospective studies of first-line rituximab chemotherapy for patients with high-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (the PRIMA study, the PET-Folliculaire study, and the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi FOLL05 study). Patients included in this analysis received at least six cycles of rituximab and chemotherapy before response assessment with conventional contrast-enhanced CT and PET low-dose CT (PET). We included only patients who had a PET scan within 3 months of the last dose of induction rituximab. Patient data, including conventional CT-based response assessment, were recorded for all patients undergoing PET review. Scans undergoing central PET review were scored independently by three reviewers according to the 5PS. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival according to the 5PS score of post-induction PET scan (ie, positive [≥4 points] or negative [
ISSN:2352-3026
2352-3026
DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(14)70008-0