Correlation of the tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance with the Q-angle
Purpose The Q-angle has been used for years to quantify lateralization of the patella. The tibial tuberosity–trochlea groove distance (TT–TG distance) was introduced to analyse patellar tracking. Does a significant correlation exist between these two parameters? Do other significant interrelations e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016-03, Vol.24 (3), p.915-920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The Q-angle has been used for years to quantify lateralization of the patella. The tibial tuberosity–trochlea groove distance (TT–TG distance) was introduced to analyse patellar tracking. Does a significant correlation exist between these two parameters? Do other significant interrelations exist between the Q-angle/TT–TG distance, torsion of the femur and tibia, the frontal axis, overall leg length, gender, former patellar dislocation, BMI?
Methods
One hundred knees in 55 patients with patellofemoral symptoms were included in a prospective study. All patients underwent clinical examination, including measurement of the Q-angle. A torsional CT was obtained from all patients.
Results
The correlation coefficient was 0.33/0.34 (left/right leg), showing that the TT–TG distance tends to rise in direct ratio to a rising Q-angle. Thus, a significant correlation was found (
p
= 0.017). Femoral and tibial torsion had a positive effect on the TT–TG distance, but showed no significant correlation. Leg length had a significant effect on the TT–TG distance (
p
= 0.04). The frontal axis had a nonsignificant influence on the Q-angle or TT–TG distance. On average, the Q-angle in women was 2.38° greater than it was in men, but the difference was not significant.
Conclusion
A significant correlation was noted between the Q-angle and the TT–TG distance. Both depend on various parameters and must be assessed for the analysis of patellofemoral maltracking. The Q-angle did not differ significantly between men and women; thus, the conclusion is that no different ranges need not be used.
Level of evidence
Diagnostic study, Level III. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0942-2056 1433-7347 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00167-014-3426-2 |