Sarcopenia and inflammation are independent predictors of survival in male patients newly diagnosed with small cell lung cancer

Purpose Sarcopenia is suggested to be associated with cancer-related inflammation. We assessed the clinical outcome of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients according to sarcopenia and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Methods A total of 117 male SCLC patients treated with first-line chemo-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2016-05, Vol.24 (5), p.2075-2084
Hauptverfasser: Go, Se-Il, Park, Mi Jung, Song, Haa-Na, Kang, Myoung Hee, Park, Hee Jung, Jeon, Kyung Nyeo, Kim, Seok-Hyun, Kim, Moon Jin, Kang, Jung-Hun, Lee, Gyeong-Won
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Sarcopenia is suggested to be associated with cancer-related inflammation. We assessed the clinical outcome of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients according to sarcopenia and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Methods A total of 117 male SCLC patients treated with first-line chemo- or chemoradiotherapy were assessed based on a retrospective chart review. The mass of the pectoralis muscle was measured by computed tomography and normalized to height. Patients with the lowest quartile of muscle mass were considered to have sarcopenia. Patients were classified into four groups according to their sarcopenia and NLR statuses: sarcopenia/high NLR, sarcopenia/low NLR, non-sarcopenia/high NLR, and non-sarcopenia/low NLR. Results Sarcopenic patients had lower progression-free survival (PFS) than did non-sarcopenic patients (median 6.0 vs. 7.5 months, p  = 0.009), but the difference in overall survival (OS) was not statistically significant (median 10.5 vs. 13.5 months, p  = 0.052). However, the OS of sarcopenic patients with high NLR was significantly lower than that in all other groups (median 3.2 vs. 16.0 vs. 12.5 vs. 13.7 months, respectively, p  
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-015-2997-x