Reply: Do the 10-Year Mortality Outcomes of RITA-3 Inform Contemporary Clinical Practice?
RITA-3 enrolled patients before the introduction of serum troponin as a routine biomarker of myocardial necrosis, but 92% had evidence of myocardial ischemia on a baseline electrocardiogram (ST-segment deviation in 43%) and it is likely that the majority would have been biomarker positive using cont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-03, Vol.67 (12), p.1502-1503 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | RITA-3 enrolled patients before the introduction of serum troponin as a routine biomarker of myocardial necrosis, but 92% had evidence of myocardial ischemia on a baseline electrocardiogram (ST-segment deviation in 43%) and it is likely that the majority would have been biomarker positive using contemporary high-sensitivity troponin assays. [...]the adverse cardiovascular event rates at 5 years in the FRISC-2 (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 trials were similar, with all-cause mortality rates of 10.1%, 9.9%, and 15.1%, respectively (2), suggesting that the 3 major trials of routine invasive versus selective invasive strategies in NSTE-ACS enrolled patients at broadly comparable levels of cardiovascular risk. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.064 |