Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of inducing labor using a double-balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) sequentially, in comparison with vaginal PGE2 alone after previous cesarean section. Methods A total of 264 pregnant women with previous cesarean section undergoing labor induction...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2016-04, Vol.293 (4), p.757-765 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of inducing labor using a double-balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) sequentially, in comparison with vaginal PGE2 alone after previous cesarean section.
Methods
A total of 264 pregnant women with previous cesarean section undergoing labor induction at term were included in this prospective multicentre cohort study. Induction of labor was performed either by vaginal PGE2 gel or double-balloon catheter followed by vaginal PGE2. The primary outcome measure was the cesarean section rate.
Results
The cesarean section rate was 37 % without any statistically significant difference between the two groups (PGE2:
n
= 41, 37 % vs. balloon catheter/PGE2:
n
= 41, 42 %;
P
= 0.438). The median (range) number of applications of PGE2 [2 (1–10) versus 1 (0–8),
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00404-015-3907-7 |