Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of inducing labor using a double-balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) sequentially, in comparison with vaginal PGE2 alone after previous cesarean section. Methods A total of 264 pregnant women with previous cesarean section undergoing labor induction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2016-04, Vol.293 (4), p.757-765
Hauptverfasser: Kehl, Sven, Weiss, Christel, Wamsler, Michael, Beyer, Jana, Dammer, Ulf, Heimrich, Jutta, Faschingbauer, Florian, Sütterlin, Marc, Beckmann, Matthias W., Schleussner, Ekkehard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of inducing labor using a double-balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) sequentially, in comparison with vaginal PGE2 alone after previous cesarean section. Methods A total of 264 pregnant women with previous cesarean section undergoing labor induction at term were included in this prospective multicentre cohort study. Induction of labor was performed either by vaginal PGE2 gel or double-balloon catheter followed by vaginal PGE2. The primary outcome measure was the cesarean section rate. Results The cesarean section rate was 37 % without any statistically significant difference between the two groups (PGE2: n  = 41, 37 % vs. balloon catheter/PGE2: n  = 41, 42 %; P  = 0.438). The median (range) number of applications of PGE2 [2 (1–10) versus 1 (0–8), P  
ISSN:0932-0067
1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-015-3907-7