Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience

Abstract Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the 5-year survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent an, open radical hysterectomy (ORH), robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for the treatment of their dise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Surgical oncology 2016-03, Vol.25 (1), p.66-71
Hauptverfasser:	Mendivil, Alberto A, Rettenmaier, Mark A, Abaid, Lisa N, Brown, John V, Micha, John P, Lopez, Katrina L, Goldstein, Bram H
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Age Biomedical research Body mass index Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Cervical cancer Endoscopic surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Hospitals Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - mortality Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Lymphatic system Medical prognosis Medical research Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging Open surgery Outcomes Prognosis Radical hysterectomy Retrospective Studies Robotics Robotics - methods Studies Surgery Survival Rate Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery Variance analysis
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Abstract Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the 5-year survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent an, open radical hysterectomy (ORH), robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for the treatment of their disease. Method We conducted a review of all cervical cancer patients who were managed with an ORH, RRH or LRH. Result Forty-nine patients were treated with LRH, 58 were managed via RRH and 39 patients underwent an ORH. The LRH (1.78 h) patients had a significantly shorter operative duration than the RRH (2.88 h) and ORH (2.39 h) subjects (p
ISSN:	0960-7404 1879-3320
DOI:	10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.004