Quantification of maize water uptake from different layers and root zones under alternate furrow irrigation using stable oxygen isotope

•The study focuses on quantifying maize water uptake under alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) by using stable isotope.•Soil water in wet side was firstly absorbed by maize root and then transported to the dry side.•Maize water uptake was from deeper soil with the advance of growth stage.•Maize water...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural water management 2016-04, Vol.168, p.35-44
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Youjie, Du, Taisheng, Li, Fusheng, Li, Sien, Ding, Risheng, Tong, Ling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The study focuses on quantifying maize water uptake under alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) by using stable isotope.•Soil water in wet side was firstly absorbed by maize root and then transported to the dry side.•Maize water uptake was from deeper soil with the advance of growth stage.•Maize water uptake from different soil zones varied significantly at AFI.•The leading factor affecting maize water uptake was the root distribution and the soil water content. How to quantify the root water uptake from different soil layers under alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) condition accurately, is still of great challenge. In this study, the stable hydrogen and oxygen (δD and δ18O) isotopes of soil water, stem water, rainfall and irrigation water (groundwater) in the maize field system under AFI condition were measured during 2013–2014. The root water uptake was estimated by the multi-source mass balance method (IsoSource model). Results showed that δ18O distribution varied significantly between the ridge (R) and furrow (F) near soil surface, and between ridge surface and wet furrow under AFI. δ18O in stem water had better response to soil water variation at wet side, and soil water in wet side was firstly absorbed by maize root and then transported to the dry side. Maize water uptake was mainly from the depths of 20–40cm at the late jointing stage, 40–60cm at the late heading stage and 40–80cm at the filling stage, with relative contribution of 84, 80 and 66%, respectively. Maize water uptake from different soil zones varied remarkably at AFI. For example, at the filling stage, 16–52% of maize water uptake was from the depth of 60–80cm below the ridge (dry side) before irrigation, 32–78 and 14–64% from the surface soil (0–20cm) of wet furrow and the ridge at 1 day after irrigation, 14–60 and 8–54% from the depths of 20–40cm below the ridge side and 40–60cm below wet furrow at 3 day after irrigation, and 6–80 and 30–60% from the depths of 60–80cm below the ridge and 40–60cm below the ridge side at 7 day after irrigation. Thus maize root water uptake was from deeper soil with the advance of growth stage, and it was mainly from the deeper soil in dry side and the shallow soil in wet side under AFI.
ISSN:0378-3774
1873-2283
DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.013