Yield of double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel strictures

Abstract Background Small bowel strictures are common in gastroenterology practice. We report diagnostic and therapeutic yield of double-balloon enteroscopy for small bowel strictures. Methods Retrospective study of 71 consecutive patients who were found to have small bowel stricture at the time of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2016-04, Vol.48 (4), p.446-448
Hauptverfasser: Kroner, Paul T, Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik S, Bartel, Michael J, Stark, Mark E, Lukens, Frank J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Small bowel strictures are common in gastroenterology practice. We report diagnostic and therapeutic yield of double-balloon enteroscopy for small bowel strictures. Methods Retrospective study of 71 consecutive patients who were found to have small bowel stricture at the time of double-balloon enteroscopy. Results During double-balloon enteroscopy, stricture identification and tissue sampling were possible in all 71 cases. Surgical pathology reported aetiology as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (32%), non-specific (21%), Crohn's disease (21%), radiation-induced (9%), tumour (10%), anastomotic (4%), celiac disease (1%), and surgical adhesions (1%). Sixteen patients (23%) underwent balloon dilation. Sensitivity of abdominal computed-tomography and video-capsule endoscopy for strictures based on double balloon enteroscopy findings was 61% and 43%, respectively. Conclusion Double-balloon enteroscopy was safe and effective to access small bowel stricture with direct visualization and tissue sampling or for therapeutic balloon dilation. Given low sensitivity with conventional computed-tomography and/or video-capsule endoscopy for small bowel stricture, double-balloon enteroscopy can be considered if clinical suspicion is high.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.019