Factors Associated with Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasonography with a Guide Sheath for Peripheral Lung Cancer

Endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) has recently been used for improved diagnostic yields for peripheral pulmonary lesions. This study retrospectively evaluated the factors related to the diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS for peripheral lung cancer. The medical records of 76 patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of UOEH 2016/03/01, Vol.38(1), pp.17-23
Hauptverfasser: UCHIMURA, Keigo, YAMASAKI, Kei, ISHIMOTO, Hiroshi, KAKINOUCHI, Sho, KIMURA, Koki, KANAYA, Tomoko, MATSUNAGA, Takafumi, KAWAGUCHI, Takako, FUKUDA, Yoko, SAKAGAMI, Kazuki, HATA, Ryosuke, IDEGUCHI, Shuhei, TAKAKI, Tsutomu, SHIRAISHI, Tomoko, AKATA, Kentaro, HANAKA, Minako, NISHIDA, Chinatsu, KIDO, Takashi, YATERA, Kazuhiro, MUKAE, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) has recently been used for improved diagnostic yields for peripheral pulmonary lesions. This study retrospectively evaluated the factors related to the diagnostic yield of EBUS-GS for peripheral lung cancer. The medical records of 76 patients who had been diagnosed with lung cancer and had undergone bronchoscopy with EBUS-GS in our hospital between August 2014 and September 2015 were reviewed. The total diagnostic ratio of peripheral lung cancer was 71.1%. The following factors of the diagnostic yield were evaluated: location of pulmonary lesion; size; feature; bronchus sign; location of EBUS probe; EBUS detection; number of biopsies performed; procedure time; use of virtual bronchoscopic navigation; use of EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with EBUS-GS; CT slice thickness; operatorʼs years of medical experience; and specialized training in bronchoscopy at the National Cancer Center. In all cases, lesion size ≧ 20 mm (80.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.006), EBUS probe location “within” (90.0% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001), EBUS detection (80.7% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001), number of biopsies ≧ 5 (78.0% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.013), and bronchoscopy training (81.6% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.043) significantly contributed to an increase in the diagnostic yield. Following a multivariate analysis, EBUS probe location “within” was found to be the most significant factor affecting the diagnostic yield (odds ratio 14.10, 95% CI 3.53-56.60, P < 0.001), and bronchoscopy training was the second most significant factor (odds ratio 6.93, 95% CI 1.86-25.80, P = 0.004). EBUS probe location “within” and bronchoscopy training are the most important factors for improved diagnostic yield by bronchoscopy with EBUS-GS for peripheral lung cancer.
ISSN:0387-821X
2187-2864
DOI:10.7888/juoeh.38.17