Approach and complications associated with suburethral synthetic slings in women: Systematic review and meta-analysis

We aim to assess the complications associated with different approaches used in female suburethral sling surgery. We performed a research on Medline using the following keywords: "suburethral slings", "complications", "safety" and "randomized". Only randomized clinical trials including women and reporting intra- and postoperative complications associated with the retropubic (RP) approach; TOT and/or TVT-O were included. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) software delivered by the "Cochrane Library". Out of 176 articles, 23 were included in synthesis. Risks of bladder perforation during surgery (60/1482 vs 5/1479; OR=6.44; 95% CI [3.32-12.50]) and postoperative urinary retention (48/1160 vs 24/1159; OR=1.93; 95% CI [1.26-3.12]) were significantly higher with the RP approach, when compared with the transobturator (TO) approach (TOT or TVT-O). Conversely, the risk of prolonged postoperative pain was significantly lower after RP approach, when compared with TO approach (24/1156 vs 69/1149; OR=0.36; 95% CI [0.23-0.56]). Risks of intraoperative urethral injury, postoperative erosion and de novo overactive bladder were comparable between the two approaches. Data regarding the comparison between TOT and TVT-O were scarce and did not allow us to conclude about complications associated with. The RP approach was associated with a significant risk of bladder perforation and postoperative urinary retention. The TO approach was associated with a higher risk of prolonged postoperative pain.