Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis
Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | FEMS microbiology letters 2004-09, Vol.238 (1), p.263-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | FEMS microbiology letters |
container_volume | 238 |
creator | Kimura, Kenji Kumar Rai, Shiba Takemasa, Kaoru Ishibashi, Yoshinobu Kawabata, Masato Belosevic, Miodrag Uga, Shoji |
description | Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of
C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation, sucrose centrifugal floatation, and direct smear. Standard procedures were used for the formalin–ether sedimentation and the sucrose centrifugal floatation techniques using 0.5 g of feces, however, the direct smear technique was performed using 10 μl of fecal suspension (0.005 g of feces) and observed under the fluorescent microscope. Of the 403 samples examined, 21 samples were positive for oocysts by all three techniques. Therefore, in these 21 samples, the number of oocysts recovered by the three techniques were compared. The highest number of oocyst was obtained by the sucrose centrifugal floatation technique. In contrast, the formalin–ether sedimentation technique was found to be the least reliable concentration technique for the detection of
Cyclospora in human feces. Surprisingly, the direct smear technique was found to be an effective and rapid technique for diagnosis of
C. cayetanensis making it a technique of choice for routine epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of this infection in human populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.045 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_elsev</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17705312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S037810970400549X</els_id><sourcerecordid>17705312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e239t-49f140356f1e9c1184943f8c7ed204ae521e957a3a605f1333730b6b113eb8023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAQQIMouK7-Aw89eWudadKmvQhS_IIFD-o5ZNOJm6VtatIV9t_bsp4GZh7D4zF2i5AhYHm_zyz1saMsBxAZyAxEccZWWEiRlnVZnbMVcFmlCLW8ZFcx7mEGcyhX7KPx_aiDi35IvE2mXSBKemeCj8aPziQTmd3gfg4UE-tD0jr9Pfjo4kI3R9P5OPqgE6OPNOmBhvl0zS6s7iLd_M81-3p--mxe0837y1vzuEkp5_WUitqiAF6UFqk2iJWoBbeVkdTmIDQV-bwvpOa6hMIi51xy2JZbRE7bCnK-Znenv2Pwi-CkehcNdd3s4Q9RoZRQcFzAhxNIs82vo6CicTQYal0gM6nWO4WglpZqr04t1dJSgVRzS_4HDSBq4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17705312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kimura, Kenji ; Kumar Rai, Shiba ; Takemasa, Kaoru ; Ishibashi, Yoshinobu ; Kawabata, Masato ; Belosevic, Miodrag ; Uga, Shoji</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Kenji ; Kumar Rai, Shiba ; Takemasa, Kaoru ; Ishibashi, Yoshinobu ; Kawabata, Masato ; Belosevic, Miodrag ; Uga, Shoji</creatorcontrib><description>Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of
C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation, sucrose centrifugal floatation, and direct smear. Standard procedures were used for the formalin–ether sedimentation and the sucrose centrifugal floatation techniques using 0.5 g of feces, however, the direct smear technique was performed using 10 μl of fecal suspension (0.005 g of feces) and observed under the fluorescent microscope. Of the 403 samples examined, 21 samples were positive for oocysts by all three techniques. Therefore, in these 21 samples, the number of oocysts recovered by the three techniques were compared. The highest number of oocyst was obtained by the sucrose centrifugal floatation technique. In contrast, the formalin–ether sedimentation technique was found to be the least reliable concentration technique for the detection of
Cyclospora in human feces. Surprisingly, the direct smear technique was found to be an effective and rapid technique for diagnosis of
C. cayetanensis making it a technique of choice for routine epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of this infection in human populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cyclospora cayetanensis ; Detection ; Fecal examination ; Prevalence ; Techniques</subject><ispartof>FEMS microbiology letters, 2004-09, Vol.238 (1), p.263-266</ispartof><rights>2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar Rai, Shiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemasa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Yoshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belosevic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uga, Shoji</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis</title><title>FEMS microbiology letters</title><description>Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of
C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation, sucrose centrifugal floatation, and direct smear. Standard procedures were used for the formalin–ether sedimentation and the sucrose centrifugal floatation techniques using 0.5 g of feces, however, the direct smear technique was performed using 10 μl of fecal suspension (0.005 g of feces) and observed under the fluorescent microscope. Of the 403 samples examined, 21 samples were positive for oocysts by all three techniques. Therefore, in these 21 samples, the number of oocysts recovered by the three techniques were compared. The highest number of oocyst was obtained by the sucrose centrifugal floatation technique. In contrast, the formalin–ether sedimentation technique was found to be the least reliable concentration technique for the detection of
Cyclospora in human feces. Surprisingly, the direct smear technique was found to be an effective and rapid technique for diagnosis of
C. cayetanensis making it a technique of choice for routine epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of this infection in human populations.</description><subject>Cyclospora cayetanensis</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Fecal examination</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Techniques</subject><issn>0378-1097</issn><issn>1574-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAQQIMouK7-Aw89eWudadKmvQhS_IIFD-o5ZNOJm6VtatIV9t_bsp4GZh7D4zF2i5AhYHm_zyz1saMsBxAZyAxEccZWWEiRlnVZnbMVcFmlCLW8ZFcx7mEGcyhX7KPx_aiDi35IvE2mXSBKemeCj8aPziQTmd3gfg4UE-tD0jr9Pfjo4kI3R9P5OPqgE6OPNOmBhvl0zS6s7iLd_M81-3p--mxe0837y1vzuEkp5_WUitqiAF6UFqk2iJWoBbeVkdTmIDQV-bwvpOa6hMIi51xy2JZbRE7bCnK-Znenv2Pwi-CkehcNdd3s4Q9RoZRQcFzAhxNIs82vo6CicTQYal0gM6nWO4WglpZqr04t1dJSgVRzS_4HDSBq4A</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Kimura, Kenji</creator><creator>Kumar Rai, Shiba</creator><creator>Takemasa, Kaoru</creator><creator>Ishibashi, Yoshinobu</creator><creator>Kawabata, Masato</creator><creator>Belosevic, Miodrag</creator><creator>Uga, Shoji</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis</title><author>Kimura, Kenji ; Kumar Rai, Shiba ; Takemasa, Kaoru ; Ishibashi, Yoshinobu ; Kawabata, Masato ; Belosevic, Miodrag ; Uga, Shoji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e239t-49f140356f1e9c1184943f8c7ed204ae521e957a3a605f1333730b6b113eb8023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cyclospora cayetanensis</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Fecal examination</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar Rai, Shiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemasa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Yoshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabata, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belosevic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uga, Shoji</creatorcontrib><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>FEMS microbiology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimura, Kenji</au><au>Kumar Rai, Shiba</au><au>Takemasa, Kaoru</au><au>Ishibashi, Yoshinobu</au><au>Kawabata, Masato</au><au>Belosevic, Miodrag</au><au>Uga, Shoji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis</atitle><jtitle>FEMS microbiology letters</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>263-266</pages><issn>0378-1097</issn><eissn>1574-6968</eissn><abstract>Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of
C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation, sucrose centrifugal floatation, and direct smear. Standard procedures were used for the formalin–ether sedimentation and the sucrose centrifugal floatation techniques using 0.5 g of feces, however, the direct smear technique was performed using 10 μl of fecal suspension (0.005 g of feces) and observed under the fluorescent microscope. Of the 403 samples examined, 21 samples were positive for oocysts by all three techniques. Therefore, in these 21 samples, the number of oocysts recovered by the three techniques were compared. The highest number of oocyst was obtained by the sucrose centrifugal floatation technique. In contrast, the formalin–ether sedimentation technique was found to be the least reliable concentration technique for the detection of
Cyclospora in human feces. Surprisingly, the direct smear technique was found to be an effective and rapid technique for diagnosis of
C. cayetanensis making it a technique of choice for routine epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of this infection in human populations.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.045</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1097 |
ispartof | FEMS microbiology letters, 2004-09, Vol.238 (1), p.263-266 |
issn | 0378-1097 1574-6968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17705312 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cyclospora cayetanensis Detection Fecal examination Prevalence Techniques |
title | Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T15%3A17%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_elsev&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20microscopic%20techniques%20for%20diagnosis%20of%20Cyclospora%20cayetanensis&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20microbiology%20letters&rft.au=Kimura,%20Kenji&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=263-266&rft.issn=0378-1097&rft.eissn=1574-6968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_elsev%3E17705312%3C/proquest_elsev%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17705312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S037810970400549X&rfr_iscdi=true |