Comparison of three microscopic techniques for diagnosis of Cyclospora cayetanensis

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:FEMS microbiology letters 2004-09, Vol.238 (1), p.263-266
Hauptverfasser: Kimura, Kenji, Kumar Rai, Shiba, Takemasa, Kaoru, Ishibashi, Yoshinobu, Kawabata, Masato, Belosevic, Miodrag, Uga, Shoji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts in the feces of humans from Kathmandu, Nepal were identified on the basis of their size and other morphological characteristics. We compared the detection of C. cayetanensis oocysts in the feces using three microscopic techniques such as formalin–ether sedimentation, sucrose centrifugal floatation, and direct smear. Standard procedures were used for the formalin–ether sedimentation and the sucrose centrifugal floatation techniques using 0.5 g of feces, however, the direct smear technique was performed using 10 μl of fecal suspension (0.005 g of feces) and observed under the fluorescent microscope. Of the 403 samples examined, 21 samples were positive for oocysts by all three techniques. Therefore, in these 21 samples, the number of oocysts recovered by the three techniques were compared. The highest number of oocyst was obtained by the sucrose centrifugal floatation technique. In contrast, the formalin–ether sedimentation technique was found to be the least reliable concentration technique for the detection of Cyclospora in human feces. Surprisingly, the direct smear technique was found to be an effective and rapid technique for diagnosis of C. cayetanensis making it a technique of choice for routine epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of this infection in human populations.
ISSN:0378-1097
1574-6968
DOI:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.045