Combination of powdered activated carbon and powdered zeolite for enhancing ammonium removal in micro-polluted raw water
•We assessed the removal performance of the combination in coagulation.•The efficient molecular weight removal range was studied upon GFC.•Synergistic effect promotes ammonium removal efficiency.•Antagonism blocks the due removal on CODMn, but not evident on UV254.•Early phase of flocculation shall...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.134, p.127-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We assessed the removal performance of the combination in coagulation.•The efficient molecular weight removal range was studied upon GFC.•Synergistic effect promotes ammonium removal efficiency.•Antagonism blocks the due removal on CODMn, but not evident on UV254.•Early phase of flocculation shall be the optimized dosing point.
Even zeolite is promising in ammonia pollution disposing, its removal efficiency is frequently interfered by organics. As activated carbon has good removal efficiency on organic contaminants, combination of two adsorbents may allow their respective adsorption characteristics into full play. This paper provides a performance assessment of the combination for enhancing ammonium removal in micro-polluted raw water. Gel-filtration chromatography (GFC) was carried out to quantify the molecular weight (MW) range of organic contaminants that powdered activated carbon (PAC) and powdered zeolite (PZ) can remove. The polydispersity difference which also calculated from GFC may indicate the wider organic contaminants removal range of PAC and the relatively centralized removal range of PZ. The jar tests of combination dosing confirm a synergistic effect which promotes ammonium removing. Nevertheless, it also shows an antagonism hindering the due removal performance of the two adsorbents on CODMn, while it is not much evident on UV254. Furthermore, a comparison study with simulated coagulation–sedimentation process was conducted to evaluate the optimum dosing points (spatial and temporal) of PAC and PZ among follows: suction well, pipeline mixer, early and middle phase of flocculation. We suggest to dose both two adsorbents into the early phase of flocculation to maximize the versatile removal efficiency on turbidity, ammonium and organic contaminants. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.088 |