18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base
Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoratio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.669-675 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 675 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 669 |
| container_title | Dental materials |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | van de Sande, Françoise H Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A Basso, Gabriela R Patias, Rômulo da Rosa, Quéren F Demarco, Flávio F Opdam, Niek J Cenci, Maximiliano S |
| description | Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoration with or without bases. • The long-term survival of restorations was not affected by the use GIC as base. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770280689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564115000834</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680957951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-f973236694c3ee213d06a44b05ec3705fabfc9bff1d3f9a6bb19136f9145dd9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQtRCIbgt_gJCPXBLGcezEFyRUFYpUiQNwthx7TL0k8WIni_bvcdjCgUsvtkd-b2b03iPkFYOaAZNv97XDeTFj3QATNfAaQD4hO9Z3qgJQ3VOyAwaqErJlF-Qy5z0AtI1iz8lFI3rJRcN35J711QlNonlNx3A0I42eHmJeMIWYqI1TKcKCNGEO83YuMZklxDnTX2G5p2Z2fx5xXej30eRMy1-csHBxKgtSk-lgMr4gz7wZM758uK_Itw83X69vq7vPHz9dv7-rrGhgqbzqeMOlVK3liA3jDqRp2wEEWt6B8GbwVg3eM8e9MnIYmGJcesVa4Zxy_Iq8Ofc9pPhzLevqKWSL42hmjGvWrOug6UH26nGo7EGJTglWoO0ZalPMOaHXhxQmk06agd7s0Ht9tkNvdmjguthRaK8fJqzDhO4f6a_-BfDuDMAiyTFg0tkGnC26kNAu2sXw2IT_G9gxzMGa8QeeMO_jmuYit2Y6Nxr0ly0SWyKYKGnoect_AzpDs2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680957951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van de Sande, Françoise H ; Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A ; Basso, Gabriela R ; Patias, Rômulo ; da Rosa, Quéren F ; Demarco, Flávio F ; Opdam, Niek J ; Cenci, Maximiliano S</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Françoise H ; Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A ; Basso, Gabriela R ; Patias, Rômulo ; da Rosa, Quéren F ; Demarco, Flávio F ; Opdam, Niek J ; Cenci, Maximiliano S</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoration with or without bases. • The long-term survival of restorations was not affected by the use GIC as base.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25863523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Composite resin ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dentistry ; Failure ; Failure rates ; Female ; Glass ionomer cement ; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry ; Humans ; Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives ; Male ; Medical services ; Methacrylates ; Patients ; Permanent dental restoration ; Polyurethanes ; Resin Cements ; Restoration ; Retrospective Studies ; Silicon Dioxide ; Statistical analysis ; Surface Properties ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Teeth ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.669-675</ispartof><rights>Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2015 Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-f973236694c3ee213d06a44b05ec3705fabfc9bff1d3f9a6bb19136f9145dd9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-f973236694c3ee213d06a44b05ec3705fabfc9bff1d3f9a6bb19136f9145dd9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7279-0708</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25863523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Françoise H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Gabriela R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patias, Rômulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rosa, Quéren F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarco, Flávio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opdam, Niek J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cenci, Maximiliano S</creatorcontrib><title>18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoration with or without bases. • The long-term survival of restorations was not affected by the use GIC as base.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Composite resin</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure rates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glass ionomer cement</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical services</subject><subject>Methacrylates</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Permanent dental restoration</subject><subject>Polyurethanes</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQtRCIbgt_gJCPXBLGcezEFyRUFYpUiQNwthx7TL0k8WIni_bvcdjCgUsvtkd-b2b03iPkFYOaAZNv97XDeTFj3QATNfAaQD4hO9Z3qgJQ3VOyAwaqErJlF-Qy5z0AtI1iz8lFI3rJRcN35J711QlNonlNx3A0I42eHmJeMIWYqI1TKcKCNGEO83YuMZklxDnTX2G5p2Z2fx5xXej30eRMy1-csHBxKgtSk-lgMr4gz7wZM758uK_Itw83X69vq7vPHz9dv7-rrGhgqbzqeMOlVK3liA3jDqRp2wEEWt6B8GbwVg3eM8e9MnIYmGJcesVa4Zxy_Iq8Ofc9pPhzLevqKWSL42hmjGvWrOug6UH26nGo7EGJTglWoO0ZalPMOaHXhxQmk06agd7s0Ht9tkNvdmjguthRaK8fJqzDhO4f6a_-BfDuDMAiyTFg0tkGnC26kNAu2sXw2IT_G9gxzMGa8QeeMO_jmuYit2Y6Nxr0ly0SWyKYKGnoect_AzpDs2U</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>van de Sande, Françoise H</creator><creator>Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A</creator><creator>Basso, Gabriela R</creator><creator>Patias, Rômulo</creator><creator>da Rosa, Quéren F</creator><creator>Demarco, Flávio F</creator><creator>Opdam, Niek J</creator><creator>Cenci, Maximiliano S</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7279-0708</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base</title><author>van de Sande, Françoise H ; Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A ; Basso, Gabriela R ; Patias, Rômulo ; da Rosa, Quéren F ; Demarco, Flávio F ; Opdam, Niek J ; Cenci, Maximiliano S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-f973236694c3ee213d06a44b05ec3705fabfc9bff1d3f9a6bb19136f9145dd9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Composite resin</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure rates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glass ionomer cement</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical services</topic><topic>Methacrylates</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Permanent dental restoration</topic><topic>Polyurethanes</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Françoise H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Gabriela R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patias, Rômulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rosa, Quéren F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarco, Flávio F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opdam, Niek J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cenci, Maximiliano S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Sande, Françoise H</au><au>Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A</au><au>Basso, Gabriela R</au><au>Patias, Rômulo</au><au>da Rosa, Quéren F</au><au>Demarco, Flávio F</au><au>Opdam, Niek J</au><au>Cenci, Maximiliano S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>675</epage><pages>669-675</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoration with or without bases. • The long-term survival of restorations was not affected by the use GIC as base.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25863523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7279-0708</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
| ispartof | Dental materials, 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.669-675 |
| issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770280689 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Advanced Basic Science Composite resin Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Restoration Failure Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dentistry Failure Failure rates Female Glass ionomer cement Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry Humans Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives Male Medical services Methacrylates Patients Permanent dental restoration Polyurethanes Resin Cements Restoration Retrospective Studies Silicon Dioxide Statistical analysis Surface Properties Survival Survival analysis Teeth Zirconium |
| title | 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=18-year%20survival%20of%20posterior%20composite%20resin%20restorations%20with%20and%20without%20glass%20ionomer%20cement%20as%20base&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=van%20de%20Sande,%20Fran%C3%A7oise%20H&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=675&rft.pages=669-675&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680957951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680957951&rft_id=info:pmid/25863523&rft_els_id=S0109564115000834&rfr_iscdi=true |