18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base

Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Dental materials 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.669-675
Hauptverfasser:	van de Sande, Françoise H, Da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo A, Basso, Gabriela R, Patias, Rômulo, da Rosa, Quéren F, Demarco, Flávio F, Opdam, Niek J, Cenci, Maximiliano S
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Advanced Basic Science Composite resin Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Restoration Failure Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dentistry Failure Failure rates Female Glass ionomer cement Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry Humans Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives Male Medical services Methacrylates Patients Permanent dental restoration Polyurethanes Resin Cements Restoration Retrospective Studies Silicon Dioxide Statistical analysis Surface Properties Survival Survival analysis Teeth Zirconium
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Highlights • We assessed the 18-year survival of posterior resin composite restorations. • We examined the influence of having GIC as base on restoration survival. • Regarding type of failures, more fractures were seen when a base was present. • Annual failure rates were similar (∼2%) for restoration with or without bases. • The long-term survival of restorations was not affected by the use GIC as base.
ISSN:	0109-5641 1879-0097
DOI:	10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.006