Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes

•A systems approach was used to understand construction safety problems.•Eight construction safety archetypes were developed based on 22 interviews and ground theory method (GTM).•These construction safety archetypes advance the understanding of complexity and dynamics of construction safety managem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2015-07, Vol.80, p.125-141
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Brian H.W., Yiu, Tak Wing, González, Vicente A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A systems approach was used to understand construction safety problems.•Eight construction safety archetypes were developed based on 22 interviews and ground theory method (GTM).•These construction safety archetypes advance the understanding of complexity and dynamics of construction safety management.•These construction safety archetypes generate systemic insights into practical site safety management. Construction safety management involves complex issues (e.g., different trades, multi-organizational project structure, constantly changing work environment, and transient workforce). Systems thinking is widely considered as an effective approach to understanding and managing the complexity. This paper aims to better understand dynamic complexity of construction safety management by exploring archetypes of construction safety. To achieve this, this paper adopted the ground theory method (GTM) and 22 interviews were conducted with participants in various positions (government safety inspector, client, health and safety manager, safety consultant, safety auditor, and safety researcher). Eight archetypes were emerged from the collected data: (1) safety regulations, (2) incentive programs, (3) procurement and safety, (4) safety management in small businesses (5) production and safety, (6) workers’ conflicting goals, (7) blame on workers, and (8) reactive and proactive learning. These archetypes capture the interactions between a wide range of factors within various hierarchical levels and subsystems. As a free-standing tool, they advance the understanding of dynamic complexity of construction safety management and provide systemic insights into dealing with the complexity. They also can facilitate system dynamics modelling of construction safety process.
ISSN:0001-4575
1879-2057
DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.008