Comparative study of in vitro prooxidative properties and genotoxicity induced by aflatoxin B1 and its laccase-mediated detoxification products

[Display omitted] •Enzymatic detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by laccase was studied.•Maximum removal observed at pH 4.5 and 35°C.•Enzymatic derivatives showed less prooxidative activities.•Metabolized and non-metabolized forms of products did not indicated mutagenicity.•Laccase affinity for aflatoxin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.135, p.1-6
Hauptverfasser: Zeinvand-Lorestani, Hamed, Sabzevari, Omid, Setayesh, Neda, Amini, Mohsen, Nili-Ahmadabadi, Amir, Faramarzi, Mohammad Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Enzymatic detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by laccase was studied.•Maximum removal observed at pH 4.5 and 35°C.•Enzymatic derivatives showed less prooxidative activities.•Metabolized and non-metabolized forms of products did not indicated mutagenicity.•Laccase affinity for aflatoxin B1 is significantly more than riboflavin. In this paper, the enzymatic detoxification of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) by laccase was studied, and the prooxidant properties and mutagenicity of the detoxification products were compared with those of AFB1. The optimal enzymatic reaction occurred in 0.1M of citrate buffer containing 20% DMSO at 35°C, a pH of 4.5, and a laccase activity of 30UmL−1. After 2d, sixty-seven percent of the toxic substrate was removed. The prooxidative properties of the detoxified products (27% versus 86%) and the mutagenicity were significantly decreased in comparison with the parent toxin. Unlike AFB1, which promoted metabolism-dependent genetic mutations by base-pair substitution, the detoxified products did not induce genotoxicity. Comparison of the Km values for AFB1 and riboflavin, a valuable food nutrient, indicated that laccase showed greater affinity for the toxin than for riboflavin.
ISSN:0045-6535
1879-1298
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.036