Evaluation and optimization of remote sensing techniques for detection of Karenia brevis blooms on the West Florida Shelf

We evaluated the performance of several published algorithms designed to detect Karenia brevis blooms on the West Florida Shelf using satellite imagery. Algorithms were tested using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images and historical ground-truth observations collec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2015-12, Vol.170, p.239-254
Hauptverfasser: Soto, Inia M., Cannizzaro, Jennifer, Muller-Karger, Frank E., Hu, Chuanmin, Wolny, Jennifer, Goldgof, Dmitry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We evaluated the performance of several published algorithms designed to detect Karenia brevis blooms on the West Florida Shelf using satellite imagery. Algorithms were tested using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images and historical ground-truth observations collected from August 2002 to December 2011. A total of 2323 phytoplankton cell count samples collected by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) matched valid ocean color satellite observations over this period. Techniques were tested using the F-measure (FM) statistic. FM evaluates the proportion of image pixels that matches or misclassifies ground-based K. brevis observations. Several ocean color data products, such as normalized Fluorescence Line Height (nFLH), were also tested independently or combined to evaluate their effectiveness to detect K. brevis blooms. Techniques were optimized by altering their specific thresholds until the maximum FM was obtained. The historical techniques with the best performance were the Red Band Difference (RBD) and the Rrs–nFLH technique. This last method (Rrs–nFLH) is a combination of two standard ocean color data products: nFLH (>0.033mWcm−2μm−1sr−1) and the remote sensing reflectance at 555nm (Rrs555
ISSN:0034-4257
1879-0704
DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2015.09.026