Feasibility of two schedules of weekly paclitaxel in HER2-negative early breast cancer in a Brazilian community setting

Background Weekly paclitaxel has been shown more effective and less toxic than the conventional three-weekly administration. The GEICAM 9906 demonstrated effectiveness and safety of a dose-dense schedule of 100 mg/m 2 of paclitaxel given over 8 weeks (w). This schedule has been adopted at our instit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2016-03, Vol.23 (2), p.261-265
Hauptverfasser: Santana, Iuri A., Oliveira, Julia Andrade, da Silva Lima, Julianne Maria, Testa, Laura, Piato, José Roberto M., Hoff, Paulo M., Mano, Max S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Weekly paclitaxel has been shown more effective and less toxic than the conventional three-weekly administration. The GEICAM 9906 demonstrated effectiveness and safety of a dose-dense schedule of 100 mg/m 2 of paclitaxel given over 8 weeks (w). This schedule has been adopted at our institution in 2009 for HER2-negative disease, and herein, we present the first off-trial experience and compare its safety profile with that of a historical cohort of patients treated with the conventional 80 mg/m 2 over 12 w schedule. Methods Retrospective single-center chart review of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with (neo)adjuvant paclitaxel-based therapy from 2008 to 2012 with (1) 80 mg/m 2 for 12 w or (2) 100 mg/m 2 for 8 w. Adverse events were graded according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) 4.0. Results A total of 326 patients were analyzed. Median age was 52 (±10.9). Seventy and 256 patients received schedule (1) and (2), respectively. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade (G) 3/4 toxicity: pneumonitis (2.8 vs 0.3 % p  = 0.097); neuropathy (2.8 vs 0.7 % p  = 0.303); hand–foot syndrome (1.4 vs 0.3 % p  = 0.538); anemia (0 vs 0.6 % p  = 0.624); and neutropenia (5.7 vs 6.2 % p  = 0.408). Also, no significant difference was seen when comparing all grades toxicity. Schedule (2) had higher dose intensity: 97.72 vs 77.07 mg/m 2 per week ( p  
ISSN:1340-6868
1880-4233
DOI:10.1007/s12282-014-0564-9