Metallic Limus‐Eluting Stents Abluminally Coated with Biodegradable Polymers: Angiographic and Clinical Comparison of a Novel Ultra‐Thin Sirolimus Stent Versus Biolimus Stent in the DESTINY Randomized Trial

Summary Aims To evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with a new drug‐eluting stent formulation with low doses of sirolimus, built in an ultra‐thin‐strut platform coated with biodegradable abluminal coating. Methods This study is a randomized trial that tested the main hypothesis that the angiog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular therapeutics 2015-12, Vol.33 (6), p.367-371
Hauptverfasser: Lemos, Pedro A., Abizaid, Alexandre A. C., Meireles, George C., Sarmento‐Leite, Rogério, Prudente, Mauricio, Cantarelli, Marcelo, Dourado, Adriano D., Mariani, Jose, Perin, Marco A., Costantini, Costantino, Costa, Ricardo A., Costa, José Ribamar, Chamie, Daniel, Campos, Carlos A., Ribeiro, Expedito
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Aims To evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with a new drug‐eluting stent formulation with low doses of sirolimus, built in an ultra‐thin‐strut platform coated with biodegradable abluminal coating. Methods This study is a randomized trial that tested the main hypothesis that the angiographic late lumen loss of the novel sirolimus‐eluting stent is noninferior compared with commercially available biolimus‐eluting stent. A final study population comprising 170 patients with one or two de novo lesions was randomized in the ratio 2:1 for sirolimus‐eluting stent or biolimus‐eluting stent, respectively. The primary endpoint was 9‐month angiographic in‐stent late lumen loss. Adverse clinical events were prospectively collected for 1 year. Results After 9 months, the novel sirolimus‐eluting stent was shown noninferior compared with the biolimus stent for the primary endpoint (angiographic in‐stent late lumen loss: 0.20 ± 0.29 mm vs. 0.15 ± 0.20 mm, respectively; P value for noninferiority
ISSN:1755-5914
1755-5922
DOI:10.1111/1755-5922.12159