Evaluation of efficacy and safety of pelvic arterial embolization in women with primary postpartum hemorrhage

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pelvic arterial embolization (PAE) in women with intractable primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Clinical data of 36 cases were analyzed retrospectively in which women underwent PAE for intractable primary PPH in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between J...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chung-hua fu chʿan kʿo tsa chih 2016-02, Vol.51 (2), p.81-86
Hauptverfasser: Tang, P P, Hu, H Y, Gao, J S, Hu, J, Zhong, Y F, Wang, T, Song, Y N, Zhou, X Y, Yang, J Q, Liu, J T, Pan, J, Shi, H F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pelvic arterial embolization (PAE) in women with intractable primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Clinical data of 36 cases were analyzed retrospectively in which women underwent PAE for intractable primary PPH in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between Jan 2006 and Jan 2015. The success rate of PAE were measured and possible predictive risk factors associated with treatment failure were analyzed. The complications secondary to PAE were also recorded. (1) The etiology of PPH. Among the 36 cases, 21 patients delivered viginally (Group VD) and 15 received cesarean section (Group CS). The most frequent cause of PPH was uterine atony (72%, 26/36). The less common causes were placental problems (28%, 10/36), genital tract trauma (6%, 2/36) and coagulation defects (3%, 1/36) in turn. Three patients (8%, 3/36) had combined causes. (2) Interventions before PAE. Uterotonic medications were used in all patients. 31 patients received carboprost methylate suppositorites, 27 re
ISSN:0529-567X
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.02.001