Using in Vitro Iron Deposition on Asbestos To Model Asbestos Bodies Formed in Human Lung

Recent studies have shown that iron is an important factor in the chemical activity of asbestos and may play a key role in its biological effects. The most carcinogenic forms of asbestos, crocidolite and amosite, contain up to 27% iron by weight as part of their crystal structure. These minerals can acquire more iron after being inhaled, thereby forming asbestos bodies. Reported here is a method for depositing iron on asbestos fibers in vitro which produced iron deposits of the same form as observed on asbestos bodies removed from human lungs. Crocidolite and amosite were incubated in either FeCl2 or FeCl3 solutions for 2 h. To assess the effect of longer-term binding, crocidolite was incubated in FeCl2 or FeCl3 and amosite in FeCl3 for 14 days. The amount of iron bound by the fibers was determined by measuring the amount remaining in the incubation solution using an iron assay with the chelator ferrozine. After iron loading had been carried out, the fibers were also examined for the presence of an increased amount of surface iron using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS analysis showed an increased amount of surface iron on both Fe(II)- and Fe(III)-loaded crocidolite and only on Fe(III)-loaded amosite. In addition, atomic force microscopy revealed that the topography of amosite, incubated in 1 mM FeCl3 solutions for 2 h, was very rough compared with that of the untreated fibers, further evidence of Fe(III) accumulation on the fiber surfaces. Analysis of long-term Fe(III)-loaded crocidolite and amosite using X-ray diffraction (XRD) suggested that ferrihydrite, a poorly crystallized hydrous ferric iron oxide, had formed. XRD also showed that ferrihydrite was present in amosite-core asbestos bodies taken from human lung. Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) confirmed that Fe and O were the only constituent elements present on the surface of the asbestos bodies, although H cannot be detected by AES and is presumably also present. Taken together for all samples, the data reported here suggest that Fe(II) binding may result from ion exchange, possibly with Na, on the fiber surfaces, whereas Fe(III) binding forms ferrihydrite on the fibers under the conditions used in this study. Therefore, fibers carefully loaded with Fe(III) in vitro may be a particularly appropriate and useful model for the study of chemical characteristics associated with asbestos bodies and their potential for interactions in a biosystem.