Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months

Highlights • We are the first to investigate three fixation techniques in two-level lumbar cases. • UPS/UPSFS could achieve satisfactory mid-term clinical outcome comparable to BPS. • UPS instrumented TLIF should be prudently performed for two-level cases. • Cannulated screws should be replaced by s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2016-02, Vol.141, p.1-6
Hauptverfasser:	Liu, Fubing, Cao, Yuanwu, Feng, Zhenzhou, Zhou, Xiaogang, Jiang, Chun, Li, Xilei, Chen, Zixian, Li, Zheng, Liang, Yun, Jiang, Xiaoxing, Dong, Jian
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Aged Back pain Bone Screws - standards Case-Control Studies Female Fixation Follow-Up Studies Hospitals Humans Internal Fixators - standards Lumbar degenerative diseases Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Middle Aged Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging Neurodegenerative Diseases - surgery Neurology Neurosurgery Osteoporosis Patients Posterior Radiography Retrospective Studies Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Spinal Fusion - standards Standard deviation Time Factors Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Two-level
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Highlights • We are the first to investigate three fixation techniques in two-level lumbar cases. • UPS/UPSFS could achieve satisfactory mid-term clinical outcome comparable to BPS. • UPS instrumented TLIF should be prudently performed for two-level cases. • Cannulated screws should be replaced by solid screws in UPSFS instrumented TLIF.
ISSN:	0303-8467 1872-6968
DOI:	10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.12.002