The CONFIDeNT trial – Authors' reply

The CONFIDeNT trial – Authors' reply

Hotouras and colleagues then make several assertions in their Correspondence that are not supported by any published evidence, both for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and the more established treatment sacral nerve stimulation--namely, that stimulation parameters can be selected on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2016-02, Vol.387 (10019), p.644-645
Hauptverfasser: Knowles, Charles H, Horrocks, Emma J, Stevens, Natasha, Norton, Christine, Eldridge, Sandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clinical trials
Fecal incontinence
Fecal Incontinence - therapy
Feces
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical disorders
Medical treatment
Nerve conduction
Research ethics
Sacrum
Stimulation
Technology assessment
Tibial nerve
Tibial Nerve - physiology
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hotouras and colleagues then make several assertions in their Correspondence that are not supported by any published evidence, both for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and the more established treatment sacral nerve stimulation--namely, that stimulation parameters can be selected on the basis of nerve conduction studies or type of incontinence.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01342-2