Surgical Techniques for Haemodialysis Access-Induced Distal Ischaemia
Purpose Haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI) is a significant complication of vascular access creation, and has traditionally been difficult to manage without loss of access. Current treatment options include ligation, banding, distal revascularisation with interval ligation (DRIL),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of vascular access 2016-01, Vol.17 (1), p.40-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI) is a significant
complication of vascular access creation, and has traditionally been
difficult to manage without loss of access. Current treatment options
include ligation, banding, distal revascularisation with interval ligation
(DRIL), proximalisation of the arterial inflow (PAI) and revision using
distal flow (RUDI). The purpose of this review was to evaluate the
effectiveness of the different surgical techniques in the treatment of
HAIDI.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing surgical techniques
in the treatment of HAIDI in accordance with PRISMA. The primary outcome for
the study was symptomatic relief for each technique, defined within each
study. Secondary outcomes included comparison of early thrombosis rates
following each different procedure.
Results
Following strict inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers, twenty-seven
studies of surgical interventions were included and divided into subgroups
for banding, DRIL, PAI and RUDI procedures. Both DRIL and banding procedures
were found to have high rates of symptomatic relief. In addition, the DRIL
has a significantly lower rate of early thrombosis than banding although the
more recent papers seem to suggest that early thrombosis is less of a
problem in banding. PAI and RUDI showed some promise but there were too few
studies to be able to make any clear conclusions.
Conclusions
All four procedures have high success rate in relieving ischaemic symptoms
with the DRIL procedure having a significantly better vascular access
patency rate than other techniques, although further well designed studies
are required to compare all four surgical techniques. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1129-7298 1724-6032 |
DOI: | 10.5301/jva.5000467 |