The Impact of Access Blood Flow Surveillance on Reduction of Thrombosis in Native Arteriovenous Fistula: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose The usefulness of access blood flow (QA) measurement is an ongoing controversy. Although all vascular access (VA) clinical guidelines recommend monitoring and surveillance protocols to prevent VA thrombosis, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to consistently show the benefits of Q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2016-01, Vol.17 (1), p.13-19
Hauptverfasser: Aragoncillo, Inés, Amézquita, Yésika, Caldés, Silvia, Abad, Soraya, Vega, Almudena, Cirugeda, Antonio, Moratilla, Cristina, Ibeas, José, Roca-Tey, Ramón, Fernández, Cristina, Quiroga, Borja, Blanco, Ana, Villaverde, Maite, Ruiz, Caridad, Martín, Belén, Ruiz, Asunción M., Ampuero, Jara, López-Gómez, Juan M., de Alvaro, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The usefulness of access blood flow (QA) measurement is an ongoing controversy. Although all vascular access (VA) clinical guidelines recommend monitoring and surveillance protocols to prevent VA thrombosis, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to consistently show the benefits of QA-based surveillance protocols. We present a 3-year follow-up multicenter, prospective, open-label, controlled RCT, to evaluate the usefulness of QA measurement using Doppler ultrasound (DU) and ultrasound dilution method (UDM), in a prevalent hemodialysis population with native arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Methods Classical monitoring and surveillance methods are applied in all patients, the control group (n = 98) and the QA group (n = 98). Besides this, DU and UDM are performed in the QA group every three months. When QA is under 500 ml/min or there is a >25% decrease in QA the patient goes for fistulography, surgery or close clinical/surveillance observation. Thrombosis rate, assisted primary patency rate, primary patency rate and secondary patency rate are measured. Results After one-year follow-up we found a significant reduction in thrombosis rate (0.022 thrombosis/patient/year at risk in the QA group compared to 0.099 thrombosis/patient/year at risk in the control group [p = 0.030]). Assisted primary patency rate was significantly higher in the QA group than in control AVF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.99; p = 0.030). In the QA group, the numbers unddergoing angioplasty and surgery were higher but with no significant difference in non-assisted primary patency rate (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72-2.84; p = 0.293). There was a non-significant improvement in secondary patency rate in the QA group (HR 0.510, 95% CI 0.17-1.50; p = 0.207). Conclusions The measurement of QA combining DU and UDM shows a reduction in thrombosis rate and an increased assisted primary patency rate in AVF after one-year follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111655.
ISSN:1129-7298
1724-6032
DOI:10.5301/jva.5000461